Browne George Ross

WEICHERT REALTORS AND ALAIN PINEL REALTORS SUED FOR FRAUD IN BOGUS $34 MILLION OFFER FOR CALIFORNIA MANSION

San Francisco, California — Andrew August of Brown George Ross, attorney for 425 Belvedere Associates, LLC, filed suit last Friday in Marin County seeking to recover damages in excess of $12 million from real estate firms Weichert Realtors and Alain Pinel Realtors and their respective agents, Kim Farina and Stephanie Lamarre.  The suit claims that they “fraudulently induced Plaintiff to chase a $34 million purchase /sales transaction with their client, who the brokers knew or should have known was either totally fictitious or a fraud of epic proportions.”

The suit goes on to say that “over the course of several months, the broker Defendants misled the Plaintiff and its broker about the Defendants’ client, the existence of the purchase funds and Defendants’ client ability to perform under the purchase/sale agreement.  Ms. Farina would not disclose her client’s name (the offer was made through a trust), “but she did say he was a 50+/- year old man who came to the United States as a teenager and was a U.S. citizen. According to Ms. Farina, he had inherited hundreds of millions of dollars from a relative who was involved in a coup in Africa.”

In a twist right out of a spy novel, “Ms. Farina also alluded to a national security concern about her client’s identity.” The suit continues, “the brokers repeatedly used references to the CIA (and its newly named Director John Brennan), the FBI, Congress, national security, a Federal District Court Judge and other ‘Tom Clancy-esque’ words and phrases to both hide the identity and build the credibility of their purported buyer and explain his difficulties in delivering the $34 million purchase price as required.”

The extensive backgrounds of the individual real estate agents added much credibility to their stories.  Kim Farina is a Regional Vice President and 20-year veteran of Weichert managing 8 offices in the Washington DC area. Stephanie Lamarre is a high-producing agent for Alain Pinel Realtors in Marin County, California.  She has degrees from Princeton University and Stanford Law School.

According to attorney Andrew August, “There never was a real buyer and there never were any funds as represented.  The most telling thing about this case is that despite repeated requests to the Realtors and their lawyers to provide documentation that would validate their client, his bank accounts, and the bases for the brokers’ supposed personal knowledge—even with the promise that no lawsuit would be filed if they cooperated—no documents and no names were ever provided.”


Browne George Ross Obtains $30 Million for Nerve Surveillance Device Manufacturer In Dispute Against NuVasive, Inc.

LOS ANGELES – Litigation firm Browne George Ross LLP obtains a $30 million federal jury verdict in a trademark infringement case brought by Neurovision Medical Products against NuVasive. Neurovision Medical is represented by Peter W. Ross and Keith J. Wesley of Browne George Ross LLP.

In the lawsuit, Neurovision Medical alleged that, years ago when NuVasive was a startup, it deliberately appropriated for itself the goodwill associated with Neurovision Medical’s established trademark.  Following a five-day trial, the jury decided in favor of Neurovision Medical on all claims, awarding $30 million. The jury found that Neurovision Medical owns the Neurovision trademark throughout the United States, that NuVasive infringed upon that trademark willfully, and that NuVasive defrauded the United States Patent and Trademark Office by registering the trademark for itself.

This is the second eight-figure verdict Mr. Ross has obtained this year; he comments, “We are thankful for the result concluded by the jury and that our client will have ownership of their trademark.”

The plaintiff Neurovision Medical is a surgical device company based in Ventura, California.  It was founded in 1985 by Dr. J. Lee Rea, a physician and electrical engineer, who is a pioneer in the field of nerve location and avoidance technology used in surgery.  Currently, Neurovision Medical is known for state-of-the-art nerve surveillance technology, and continues to develop, market, and distribute such products throughout the United States and abroad.

The defendant NuVasive is a publicly traded medical device company based in San Diego, California.  It describes itself on its website as the “third largest spine company in the U.S.” with revenues in excess of $685 million in 2013.


Eric George Quoted In Two TMZ Articles On Same Day

Browne George Ross partner Eric George was quoted in two articles in today’s edition of TMZ.com. The first article describes BGR’s latest win – the denial of an anti-SLAPP motion – in the lawsuit the firm filed on behalf of Kim Kardashian and Kanye West against the co-founder of YouTube, Chad Hurley. The second article covers a lawsuit recently filed by musician John Mayer against BGR client Robert Maron. In the lawsuit, Mayer claims that Maron misled him into buying fake Rolex watches. When asked to comment on Mayer’s claims, George responded, “John Mayer, who briefly claimed expertise in Rolexes but now has apparently changed his mind, has brought a lawsuit that is legally and factually meritless. Mr. Maron refuses to pay Mr. Mayer a cent to settle his frivolous claim, and will instead defeat him in court.”


Browne George Ross LLP Obtains $75 Million Fraud Verdict For OrthoTec, LLC

Los Angeles — Medical device manufacturer OrthoTec, LLC significantly advanced its legal battle against New York-based private equity firm Healthpoint Capital, LLC and its principals John Foster and Mortimer Berkowitz. Last week, following a month-long trial in Los Angeles, OrthoTec obtained a fraud verdict against Surgiview, S.A.S., a Healthpoint portfolio company. OrthoTec’s theory of the case was that Foster, Berkowitz, and Healthpoint had orchestrated a fraudulent transfer of assets to Surgiview to prevent OrthoTec from collecting on a debt. The jury unanimously found for OrthoTec, awarding it $48 million, plus pre-judgment interest. OrthoTec estimates that, with interest, the award will total $75 million. OrthoTec CEO Patrick Bertranou commented that he is “a great believer in the jury system. The jurors really took our case to heart, and for that we are grateful.” Bertranou asserted that OrthoTec will now look to New York, where the same issues are slated to be tried later this year against Foster, Berkowitz, and Healthpoint. OrthoTec was represented at trial by Pete Ross and Ben Scheibe of the prominent business litigation boutique Browne George Ross LLP, with offices in Los Angeles and San Francisco. Surgiview was represented by Brad Brian of Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP.


Browne George Ross Victory Named As Top 10 Verdict of 2013

The Daily Journal today named a $65 million win by Browne George Ross to its list of the Top 10 Verdicts of 2013. In the case, BGR represents Fantasy Springs Acquisition, LLC, the holder of a note issued by the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the trustee under an indenture related to the note. The Band ceased debt service on the note, claiming economic hardship, and its casino commenced monthly distributions of $668,000 directly to the Band rather than through Wells Fargo. Fantasy Springs Acquisition retained BGR to sue the Band for breach of contract and to obtain an injunction requiring the casino’s distributions to the Band to be made through Wells Fargo. The Band defended on the ground that a judgment would violate federal Indian law and that the note requires unenforceable liquidated damages. BGR obtained summary adjudication of its breach of contract claim – securing the right to a judgment for more than $65 million (including principal of over $62 million and prejudgment interest). Eric M. George and Ira Bibbero are the lead BGR attorneys on the case.


Browne George Ross Selected to The National Law Journal’s Top Ten Litigation Boutiques Hot List for 2013

CLICK HERE FOR FULL ARTICLE:   The National Law Journal – Litigation Boutiques Hot List – At the 10 law firms spotlighted here, it’s all about skill, not size. The lawyers at these litigation shops, all of which have fewer than 51 attorneys, are as clever at practicing on paper as they are at wooing a jury. Many of the lawyers have honed their craft at the biggest and best firms in the nation and have opted, once they’ve gained crucial work experience, for a small-firm career. We’ve highlighted the special strategies and creative approaches they used in 2013 to help set precedent, right wrongs and save the day for the client. 

A Tight Focus on a Broad Array of Clients — Browne George Ross has not wavered from its intense focus on business litigation since its founding in 1985 . . . The 14-attorney litigation shop last year cleverly handled a high-stakes case for Wells Fargo N.A., which sued for payment on outstanding debt against the Cabazon Band of Mission Indians. The tribe argued that a potential judgment would violate the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act because the bank would gain an improper “proprietary interest” in the casino. . .


California Court of Appeal Ruling in Favor of Browne George Ross Clients Ensures They Have Their Day in Court

BGR represents minority shareholders of ImaginAsian Entertainment in a breach of fiduciary duty lawsuit against ImaginAsian’s majority shareholder, Korean entertainment giant CJ Corp.  After the suit had been pending for six months, CJ asked the trial court to send the case to arbitration, citing an arbitration provision in the purchase agreement between the parties.  The trial court denied CJ’s request, holding that CJ had waived the right to arbitration through its participation in litigation.  On December 18, 2013, the Second District Court of Appeal published an opinion affirming the trial court’s ruling in favor of BGR’s clients.  The appellate court confirmed that a judge, not an arbitrator, should decide whether a party has waived its right to arbitration through litigation conduct.  The court went on to affirm the finding of waiver against CJ.  A Daily Journal article profiling the decision quotes BGR lead counsel Eric M. George as saying “You can’t spend six months litigating in court and then turn around and say this should have been arbitrated.”   Assisting George in both the trial court and on appeal were BGR attorneys Benjamin D. Scheibe and Lauren Woodland.


Eric George Referenced in December 2013 Edition of Vanity Fair

An article in the December 2013 edition of Vanity Fair magazine references Browne George Ross partner Eric George.  The article, entitled “Relationship Status:  Call My Lawyer”, describes the ongoing ordeal of TechCrunch founder and BGR client Michael Arrington in confronting widely disseminated defamatory online posts of a former girlfriend.  George’s efforts on behalf of Arrington, including the filing of a pending federal court defamation suit, are described in detail in the article.


San Diego Federal Court Jury Awards $1 Million Verdict in Favor of Browne George Ross Client Brighton Collectibles

Following a four-day trial, a federal court jury found in favor of BGR client Brighton Collectibles on its claim that defendant AIF Corporation d/b/a Time World and Global Time sold knockoff watches that infringed upon Brighton’s copyrighted designs.  During the trial, AIF denied infringement and claimed that it had sold only about $25,000 of the accused watches.  BGR lead trial counsel Peter W. Ross, however, argued to the jury that AIF had failed to produce adequate, reliable evidence of its infringing sales.  The jury agreed, awarding Brighton $1 million.  This verdict is the latest in a series of trial victories by Ross and BGR partner Keith Wesley in their continuing efforts to protect Brighton against knockoffs.  Prior wins include a $10.8 million verdict against Marc Chantal and an $8 million verdict against Coldwater Creek.


Browne George Ross Files Suit on Behalf of Kanye West and Kim Kardashian

Browne George Ross LLP filed a complaint today in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of world renown entertainers Kim Kardashian and Kanye West.  The suit stems from the online posting of an unauthorized video of West’s recent marriage proposal to Kardashian.  According to the suit, the defendant, YouTube co-founder Chad Hurley, “finagled entry into an exclusive event to which he had not been invited, and which involved two people (Kardashian and West) whom Hurley had never before met.”   The suit goes on to allege that Hurley agreed that he would not publish any aspect of the event, yet he immediately breached his promise by posting a video of the event on his new business’s website.  The suit has been covered by, among others, CNN, TMZ, US Weekly, Rolling Stone, and The Hollywood Reporter.  BGR attorneys Eric M. George, Russell F. Wolpert, and Ira Bibbero represent Kardashian and West.